「史詩怒火行動」美伊戰爭第33天最新進展:荷姆茲海峽收費站與18家科技巨頭警報

Last Updated on 2026 年 4 月 1 日 by 総合編集組

Operation Epic Fury Day 33: Hormuz Toll Booth Regime, 18 US Tech Giants Under Threat, and Global Ripple Effects in the 2026 US-Iran Conflict

Introduction As of April 1, 2026, the US-Israel joint military campaign known as Operation Epic Fury has reached its 33rd day since launching on February 28. What began as targeted airstrikes has evolved into a broader conflict reshaping energy markets, technology security, and regional power dynamics. Iran has responded with asymmetric measures, including a selective “toll booth” system in the Strait of Hormuz and direct warnings against 18 major American technology companies. This summary captures the key developments, military situation, political shifts inside Iran, economic consequences, diplomatic efforts, public sentiment, and potential scenarios ahead, based on publicly available information.

「史詩怒火行動」美伊戰爭第33天最新進展:荷姆茲海峽收費站與18家科技巨頭警報
Photo by Nourieh Ferdosian on Unsplash

Current Military Situation on April 1 US and Israeli forces have established partial air superiority over western Iran and Tehran by systematically degrading Iranian air defense systems. Reports indicate over 200 air defense installations, including S-300 and S-400 sites, have been neutralized. This allows coalition forces to deploy platforms like B-1 bombers for precision strikes on military and technological targets in Tehran, such as the Tofigh Daru pharmaceutical facility alleged to be involved in chemical and biological agent development.

Key incidents on April 1 (GMT+3) include:

  • 02:06 AM – Successful interception of Iranian missiles over Damascus, Syria.
  • 03:10 AM – Israeli airstrike in Beirut targeting a senior Hezbollah commander.
  • 05:57 AM – Saudi Arabia downs two Iranian drones near oil facilities.
  • 06:50 AM – Drone attack on Kuwait International Airport causing fuel tank fires and operational disruptions.
  • 06:52 AM – Missile strike on Bahrain industrial zone.
  • 09:37 AM – Israeli precision strikes on Revolutionary Guard positions in northern and central Tehran.

Iran appears to be expanding pressure on Gulf Arab states to indirectly influence Washington toward a ceasefire.

Iranian Leadership Transition and Internal Challenges The initial strikes resulted in the deaths of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and potential successor Ali Larijani, creating a significant power vacuum. On March 9, the Assembly of Experts appointed Mojtaba Khamenei as the new Supreme Leader under heavy influence from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). However, this decision has faced backlash from clerical circles and civil society.

Actual decision-making now rests with an IRGC-dominated military committee, which has placed Mojtaba Khamenei in a more isolated role. This shift has accelerated wartime decisions but exacerbated tensions between President Masoud Pezeshkian and military leaders on economic and war-scale issues. Domestically, public opinion remains complex due to prior protest movements, with some viewing coalition strikes as potential liberation while most remain wary of territorial fragmentation risks.

The Hormuz Strait “Toll Booth Regime” Having lost conventional air control, Iran shifted to leveraging the Strait of Hormuz – the chokepoint for roughly 20% of global oil trade. Since mid-March, Iran has implemented a selective “Toll Booth Regime” instead of full closure. IRGC fast boats and shore-based missiles conduct identity checks on vessels.

Categories and handling:

  • Hostile nations (US, Israel, UK, Australia): Full blockade, seizure, or destruction.
  • Friendly nations (China, Russia, Pakistan): Passage after declaration and payment of “security fees” up to $2 million per transit.
  • Neutral nations (India, EU, parts of Southeast Asia): Strict inspections causing major delays.

Lloyd’s List data shows daily transits dropping from 130 pre-war to under 10. Brent crude has surged to $118 per barrel. Chinese COSCO vessels recently faced on-site inspections despite prior assurances, highlighting Iran’s cautious approach even toward major buyers while seeking stronger diplomatic leverage from Beijing.

April 1 Warning to 18 US Tech Giants In one of the day’s most significant developments, the IRGC issued a military warning to 18 major US technology firms, accusing them of assisting coalition targeting via AI and cloud technologies. Iranian state media demanded employees evacuate West Asia offices by 8 PM Tehran time.

The listed companies include:

  1. AI and data leaders: OpenAI, Anthropic, Palantir, Google (Alphabet), Microsoft.
  2. Hardware and cloud: Apple, Intel, Dell, Hewlett Packard (HP), IBM, Cisco, Oracle, NVIDIA.
  3. Industrial and aviation: Tesla, Boeing, General Electric, Amazon (AWS).
  4. Financial: JPMorgan Chase.

The IRGC described these entities as intelligence auxiliaries rather than pure commercial actors. Regional headquarters in Dubai and Abu Dhabi entered emergency evacuation mode. Any successful disruption to their West Asia data centers could trigger widespread digital supply chain failures.

Diplomatic Efforts and Peace Proposals Mediation continues through Pakistan, Egypt, and Turkey. US special envoy Steve Witkoff confirmed delivery of a 15-point peace framework offering Iran an “off-ramp.” Key elements reportedly include: full enriched uranium handover to IAEA and closure of key facilities; limits on ballistic missiles over 500 km range; unconditional reopening of the Strait of Hormuz with international patrols; and severance of support to Hezbollah and Houthis. In return, the US offers phased sanctions relief and civilian nuclear technology assistance.

Iran countered with five demands viewed as unacceptable by Washington: massive war reparations; international war crimes probes against Trump and Netanyahu; full US military withdrawal from Gulf bases; recognition of Iranian sovereignty over the Strait; and simultaneous de-escalation in Lebanon and Syria. Iranian officials described current talks as stalling tactics.

Global Online Sentiment and Discussions Social platforms reflect deep divisions. On Reddit’s r/geopolitics, users debate whether tech companies bear responsibility in modern warfare. Economic forums express fears of stagflation and a potential 2026 downturn due to gasoline prices exceeding $4 per gallon in the US. X (Twitter) features real-time footage under #OperationEpicFury, with polarized narratives. Stock-focused communities highlight market volatility amid conflicting statements from leaders.

Discussions increasingly center on the role of AI in conflict, with some viewing the war as signaling a shift in global power dynamics.

Broader Economic and Supply Chain Impacts Beyond oil, disruptions affect critical materials. Helium supplies from the Iran-Qatar border region – essential for semiconductor lithography cooling – have nearly halted, doubling semiconductor prices in one week. Aluminum exports from the Middle East have also surged costs in automotive and aviation sectors.

In the United States, average gasoline prices reached $4.02 per gallon, a four-year high. Allies like Australia have publicly questioned consultation levels prior to the conflict and urged energy conservation. The conflict tests global supply chain resilience across energy, technology, and manufacturing.

Future Outlook and April 6 Deadline Attention now focuses on April 6, the extended deadline set by President Trump for Iran to reopen the Strait. Potential scenarios include:

  • Ground operation escalation (approx. 40% probability), possibly targeting Kharg Island.
  • Widespread strikes on Iranian energy and water infrastructure (35%).
  • Short-term ceasefire via intensified Pakistani mediation (25%).

Regardless of the immediate outcome, the conflict has already transformed the pre-February 28 regional order.

Conclusion The events of April 1 underscore a shift toward prolonged asymmetric confrontation. The Hormuz toll system and threats to private tech firms mark new chapters in international trade logic and digital sovereignty. The coming 120 hours will be critical in determining whether escalation or de-escalation prevails. This overview is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Readers should consult official sources for the latest updates.

頁次: 1 2

0

發表留言